by Paul Dini (writer), Guillem March (art)
The Story: The Sirens’ pad gets wrecked by an angry Joker, looking to get rid of old flame Harley Quinn. Catwoman and Poison Ivy decide that enough is enough, and aim to bring the maniac down, permanently. However, our lovely trio end up discovering the object of their murderous intent might not be who they think it is.
Disclaimer: I’ll be clear. There’s really no way to review this issue without spoiling a rather important reveal towards the end. If you don’t want to know what happens, consider this fair warning. If you just want to find out if it’s worth buying, skip down to the Conclusion.
What’s Good and Not So Good: Guillem March’s artwork really sells this title. In a comic book following the exploits of three of the hottest femme fatales in the medium, you really do have to bring the sexy, and March does it in spades. Just take one look at this issue’s cover! Before you assume that’s all the artist brings to this issue, though, it should really be said that he’s done a wonderful job of capturing the mood in Dini’s script. He knows when to exaggerate his pencils for effect, punctuating the comedic moments quite well. He manages to infuse each of the three leads with a distinctive personality through their body language, as well. They each act like different types of women, which doesn’t always come through in a fair amount of comic book art, sadly.
Unfortunately, Paul Dini doesn’t completely come through with this episode. The story is obviously meant to be comical in tone, but I didn’t find myself laughing once while I was reading. It didn’t even get a smirk out of me. That’s not to say it was boring, because it wasn’t. Harley finally coming to terms with where she stands in the Joker’s life presently was a nice moment. However, when a tale that’s mainly played for laughs doesn’t even get a giggle, something is wrong.
Another big problem with the script is this issue’s big reveal. For the last couple of years, there have been two contrary portrayals of the Joker running around concurrently in DC’s comics: writer Grant Morrison’s more ghastly revision of the character and the more commonly thought of Clown Prince of Crime-version, popularized in no small part thanks to Batman: The Animated Series (a television series Dini played an important part in). It turns out that the Joker shown here (the Clown Prince of Crime) was in fact an impostor, and it’s insinuated that this Joker has been an impostor for quite some time.
My problem doesn’t lie with the impostor business as it relates to how long it’s been going on. This is obviously an easy, neat way to explain the discrepancy that has occurred with the character. My concern is with the identity of said impostor. It seems that this “Joker” has all along been his one-time “original sidekick”, Gaggy. Who, you ask? Exactly. I’ve been reading Batman for twenty years and I still drew a blank when confronted with this revelation. In fact, unless I’d read one single issue that was published back in 1966, this surprise would have fell flat for me. While I appreciate the nod to past continuity, forty-three years is a bit much for even the most dedicated Bat-fan to be expected to remember.
Conclusion: A lack of laughs in a story played for them, and a revelation that doesn’t work unless you happen to have a steel-trap memory of the last forty-plus years of Bat-history makes this issue worth skipping. Hopefully, the usually solid team of Dini and March can come though next month.
Grade: D
-Joe Lopez
Filed under: DC Comics | Tagged: Catwoman, Gotham City Sirens, Gotham City Sirens #5, Gotham City Sirens #5 review, Harley Quinn, Poison Ivey | Leave a comment »