
By: Scott Snyder (writer), Greg Capullo (pencils), Jonathan Glapion (inks), FCO (colors), Richard Starkings (letters), Katie Kubert (assistant editor), Harvey Richards (associate editor) & Mike Marts (editor)
The Story: It’s a complete mind-bender as the Court of Owls has Batman trapped in a maze. Or do they??
Three Things:
1. Interesting mechanic with the twisting storytelling. – I read this comic digitally (as I do with an increasing number of comics). And, about halfway through the issue, we started getting to panels where the orientation was “off.” By that I mean, the iPad’s concept of what was “down” was different than what my eyes said. So, to read it you had to lock the iPad’s orientation and rotate it from page-to-page. I presume the same had to be done with the dead tree version of the comic. Mixed feelings on this….. First, the twisting very much fit the story and was a good way to make the reader experience the confusion that Batman was feeling. Second, it’s great to see creators trying something different. Not everything experimental is going to work, but you don’t advance the artform by doing the same old things. Third, I really didn’t like the effect. I had to step away from the story to remind myself how to lock the iPad’s orientation, so that I could read the panels and once I’m reading an iPad technical support page, the mind-bending effect is lost. So, in summary: I credit the creators for trying something experimental and hope they never do it again. Honestly, it wouldn’t be that hard for DC to “fix” this. Just reorient those pages!
[EDIT added by Dean on Jan 25, 2012: Another thought on why the twisting orientation MAY not have worked so well digitally…. When reading on an iPad, having to reorient the device to view a double-page spread is ROUTINE. It happens about once per issue whereas reorienting a paper comic is rare (usually only for those centerfold spreads). Not sure what that means, but it is another way of explaining why it has a different effect digitally than on paper.]
2. Is this all in the mind?? – Man…..this is a really twisted story (literally). It’s impossible to tell how much of Batman’s experience in the maze is mental and how much is really happening. And….we’ll probably never know. This story immediately reminded me of two other Batman stories. One is Snyder’s own Black Mirror where Dick Grayson get’s a whiff of hallucinogenic poison that makes him see weird stuff (but you never really know if some of it is real). The other way the classic, Batman: The Cult, just for the effect of seeing Batman having a mental breakdown. Maybe Jason Todd will save him? This was a really unsettling story. I don’t even know if I enjoyed it, but I know that I’ll remember it.
3. Great bits of visual storytelling by the art team. – Twisting panel orientations aside, there was some great visual storytelling. You know how there’s always this hand-wringing from fanboys if an artist makes Batman’s eyeballs visible under the cowl? Well, I love how Batman is shown in this issue with one classic, triangle eye and the other side with the ‘lens’ smashed and showing his eyeball. For one thing, it allows Capullo to wring a lot of emotion out of Batman with the cowl on. You can’t really do that with the triangle eyes. For another, just seeing him like that says, “Man, that dude is fucked up!” Especially because this isn’t battle damage….this is more like he got disoriented and smacked his face into something and was too disturbed to fix his mask. The rest of the issue is great, from the barrage of little, tight panels that sell the disorientation, to the Owl-man’s eyes lurking behind Batman, to the scenes where Batman’s hands look more like owl talons, to the scene where the owls crawl out from inside someone…. This issue has a LOT of memorable visuals. Who knew that owls were so creepy? I always kinda liked them before.
Conclusion: A real masterpiece of a comic. Most comics you read and just kinda toss them to the side. This issue is full of visual moments that will stick with you for a long time. Wonderful storytelling by the whole creative team. But, let’s not make digital readers leave the comic and go into the iPad’s settings to be able to continue the experience.
Grade: A (ignoring the weird twisting thing and counting on DC to FIX it in the digital store)
-Dean Stell
Follow Dean on Twitter.
Follow WCBR on Twitter and Facebook.
Filed under: DC Comics | Tagged: Batman, Batman #5, Batman #5 review, DC, Dean Stell, FCO, Greg Capullo, Harvey Richards, Jonathan Glapion, Katie Kubert, Mike Marts, review, Richard Starkings, Scott Snyder | 18 Comments »